The Need for Social Media Checks in the Financial Industry

In an age where digital transparency is becoming increasingly intertwined with professional identity, the financial services industry must navigate the growing challenge of online reputational risk. Social media has blurred the boundaries between the personal and the professional, allowing individuals to project their views, values and affiliations to a global audience in real time. For financial institutions, the need to manage this reputational risk is particularly important – after all, a regulated industry built on trust and transparency is particularly liable.

The financial sector is unlike most industries. Firms are entrusted with safeguarding vast sums of money, handling sensitive information, and even influencing economic activity on a global scale. Their reputations are therefore built on public trust and perceived integrity. As such, a single employee’s controversial social media post can have disproportionate consequences. In today’s world of social media, even a minor controversial tweet can turn into a major reputational crisis immediately – especially if an employee is in a senior position of trust.

One need only look at the increasing number of public relations crises triggered by employee behaviour online. While these incidents are not confined to the financial sector, their consequences are often more severe in finance due to the industry's emphasis on stability and trust.

Regulatory compliance and social media

Beyond public perception, there is a regulatory aspect at play. Financial firms are subject to rigorous oversight by bodies such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the US. Regulators increasingly expect firms to demonstrate effective governance and risk management, not only in their financial conduct but in how they manage their people. If an employee’s online behaviour hints at discrimination, harassment, or non-compliance with regulatory standards, the firm's failure to identify and act on those red flags could invite regulatory scrutiny, fines, or legal action.

Case study: London 2023

In 2023, a London mid-tier asset management firm found themselves in hot water. One of its senior portfolio managers was discovered to have operated an anonymous account on X (formerly Twitter) that contained years’ worth of controversial political content, climate change denial, and conspiracy theories. Although these views were posted before he joined the firm, investigative journalists eventually linked the account to his real identity. Once the press had this evidence, the firm suffered serious reputational damage – several clients began to question the firm's internal vetting processes and risk governance. Within a month, two major clients announced their decision to withdraw assets, citing reputational concerns. The manager resigned amid mounting pressure, but the damage had already been done. The firm faced uncomfortable questions about its recruitment procedures and the adequacy of its cultural due diligence.

This example highlights a vulnerability that financial firms are finding hard to face: many lack robust social media screening protocols as part of their hiring and rescreening processes. Background checks often focus on financial history, criminal records, and qualifications, but overlook the insights that a person’s social media presence can offer. While it's understandable that firms wish to avoid overreach or infringe on privacy, there is a middle ground. Social media screening need not be invasive; it can focus on publicly available content, applying reasonable thresholds for what constitutes reputational risk. 

Public-facing figures

Social media checks need to be done not just on potential members of staff, but existing employees. For example, nowadays, senior figures in finance are sometimes expected to maintain public profiles. While this can elevate a firm's profile and foster client trust, it can also create potential points of exposure. A senior leader who engages in combative online debates, endorses controversial figures, or makes culturally insensitive remarks could undermine years of brand-building in a single post.

Keep staff informed

Of course, transparency and fairness are essential. Employees should be informed of social media screening policies, understand what is being assessed, and be given opportunities to explain or contextualise past posts where necessary. A well-designed policy will strike a balance between protecting a firm’s interests and respecting individual privacy.

The financial sector operates under intense scrutiny as a heavily regulated industry that has to answer to the public. Therefore, firms cannot afford to ignore the risks posed by employees’ social media activity. A single controversial post can cast a long shadow over a company’s reputation, impacting everything from client relationships to share prices, or even being able to operate as a business entirely. Social media screening offers financial institutions a critical layer of defence in managing reputational and compliance risks. 

‍